Current Campaign


Latest Archives

  1. August 23, 2010 Getting Serious about Risk Monitoring Posted in: Daily News with: 0 comments

  2. August 17, 2010 Y211? And other Risks . . . Posted in: Daily News with: 0 comments

  3. August 10, 2010 Video Spills on Government Fraud Posted in: Daily News with: 0 comments

  4. August 5, 2010 Re-Inventing the Internal Auditor? Posted in: Daily News with: 0 comments

  5. August 3, 2010 The Guidance Gauntlet Posted in: Daily News with: 0 comments

  6. July 30, 2010 Stopping the Spreadsheet Scourge Posted in: Daily News with: 1 comment

  7. July 21, 2010 Robbing Risk Management to Pay Receivables Posted in: Daily News with: 0 comments

  8. July 15, 2010 Trailblazing Uncle Sam Posted in: Daily News with: 0 comments

  9. July 13, 2010 CCM Momentum Posted in: Daily News with: 0 comments

  10. July 8, 2010 Introducing Approva One On Demand Posted in: Daily News with: 0 comments

Recent Articles

Why Detective Controls Aren’t Enough

Posted on January 23rd, 2008 by admin »Permalink

I’d like to talk today about the need for many businesses to move beyond simple detective controls to more automated preventive controls – and what the move means for business efficiency and effectiveness.

I have a chart that I like to use to illustrate the typical controls implementation evolution that companies undergo. As it shows, most companies start out with many manual controls, where a person has to manually review a sample of records to ensure there were not problems or someone has to approve a process and sign-off. This is essentially self-reporting, and often the evidence of the control is either stuck in an email somewhere or a signed piece of paper that lives in a fileing cabinet and verifies that records have been reviewed.

One of the problems with the above approach is that reviewers are examining data after events have already happened, likely at a quarterly or year-end review. This time lag means that problems in the past can be identified, but not easily rectified before there are business consequences.

Implementing controls automation brings many benefits in the form of cost and time savings – but one of the benefits with the greatest impact comes from the ability of automated controls to be both detective and preventive.

Controls automation allows for both automated notification of controls issues like duplicate payments, as well as unauthorized changes to system settings that prevent transactions like duplicate payments from even being processed. With this type of implementation, errors are not only identified automatically, but often they’re prevented from happening in the first place. These sorts of automated preventive controls certainly save time and money managing controls and correcting problems , but there is an even more important benefit for the bottom line to the business itself. Mistakes that are avoided in the first place mean that customer satisfaction is higher, shipments and revenue recognition happens faster, cost of goods sold is lower, and working capital is lower…

What’s that old saying about an ounce of prevention being worth a pound of cure? It certainly holds here. Preventing troublesome issues from occurring in the first place is a great way for reducing risk – and for saving time and resources down the road to identify and rectify past mistakes.

Tags: , ,

- Dana Hamerschlag, Senior Director, Product Marketing

Bookmark and Share

Leave a Reply